However, I'm sure you won't even bother to read this, seeing as how you don't care and all.Īnd for the record, I also own all three consoles (well, I did my 360 slim died back in July), so I'm privy to the graphical differences firsthand.(Hersteller, Modell, Serie, Codename), Suchworte mit und oder verknüpfen.
#PIXEL 3 BATMAN ARKHAM CITY PC#
PC gamers don't have that problem we KNOW our version is superior, and we're perfectly happy to watch the carnage from the sidelines while having a good laugh. It's impossible for you to be happy with your version, unless you can somehow prove it's the "superior" one. If you can implement new features and controls in ways that make the experience superior, then Im all for it, but here we have a game thats fallen into the familiar trap of attempting to alter everything without regard for whether or not it actually improves anything.
That's why you dorks wage a crusade over differences so small they would be unnoticeable were both versions not side-by-side. Batman: Arkham City Armored Edition simply tries too hard to be more than the port it honestly shouldve been. "no one cares especially console fanboys." (in Adam Sandler voice) Someone's jealous. "My graphics card does this my framerate is far superior herp derp herp derp. The reason that the PC version is never included in these "comparisons" is because everyone knows it's superior to consoles. "PC elitists are far worse than console fanboys." 360 created the whole rewards system, and trophies from sony = meh.
Ĭontrollers ( the best shooting experinece is on 360 just becuase of the controller )ĭLC ( thats why Microsoft paid the big mullah to Rockstar for the timed exclusive DLC, )Īchievements VS trophies. different buying decions for each game variant. Īll of those listed above are the best of the best in multi-plats.
#PIXEL 3 BATMAN ARKHAM CITY PS3#
I say PS3 just becuase Konami started the series on the PSX.
#PIXEL 3 BATMAN ARKHAM CITY PLUS#
looks and plays smoother plus the dual shock 3 controller is more refine for basketball maybe ? Resident Evil Racoon City ( made by capcom and have 1 more year experience on the 360 than with PS3, so the 360 has the edge I think )
Mass Effect 3 (entire trilogy), 360 no iffs or butts -)) Įx : Need for Speed ''The Run'', PS3 ( by a mile too !) Most exclusives and some multi-plat titles look awesome on both consoles. Just proves again that the 360 is a beast of a gaming machine. I thought this game was a ps3 lead platform title, resulting in better image quality on ps3 hardware. Mistergaga X 3942d ago (Edited 3942d ago ) It is a try and see if it makes a difference and if you are satisfied with the results kind of thing. Not everyone uses the same setup and so not everyone needs those settings. This way it also helps those who may not be using these features to see if they make a difference to them on their tv. Once the basic comparisons are done.then they should up the visual ante by showing what this option does or that when it is turned on. It leave the chance that one is being favored over the other out of the equation. Which is why doing them without all the bells and whistles is more accurate. To use advanced features serves to show what each 'could' look like but there are also variances that the users will not be able to discern. A true comparative is generally done with the same settings on the same screen and the same screen shot. Wouldnt a solid comparison be better made at the least common denominator? There are tweaks each system can do to enhance the visual presentation.
0 kommentar(er)
